Got all into something called “The God Particle” this week. I believe in God. In spite of my shifts in
concepts, I have always believed in an unmoved mover. I watched the most
beautifully produced documentary just the other day about the proofs behind
this and in the end found out that it had been made by Muslims. In the
conclusion of the work the narrator says, "Allah," but by this time
I'd forwarded it to a lot of my believing friends. Being a reasoning person I
had to accept that truth is truth. The video scientifically analyzed the
mathematical preciseness of the organization of the universe, and demonstrated
that how if one tiny thing were not exactly in place the whole thing would
disintegrate into utter chaos. It addressed evolution by demonstrating that
there was a certain level of geological history where life virtually exploded
and contrary to Darwin's idea that life evolved from a single root that grew
upward in ever increasing diversity, the "tree" was actually upside
down and life had in effect came into existence quiet suddenly and began to
"fine tune" as some species failed the test and disappeared from the
scene. It showed an equation called 1.618 that governed everything from the
shape of galaxies to the number of petals on a sunflower, to the proportions of
a pretty girl's face. And it was put together by Muslims!
Then I spent
several days watching a series called, "How The Earth Was Made," and
got the same information. The very planet we call home is so complex, with
intertwining systems so closely connected that it is almost beyond
comprehension. One segment explained how Antarctica, with all of its
inhospitable conditions, virtually controls our entire weather system by producing
brine that creeps along the ocean floor thereby articulating the currents that
flow around the globe. One last video studied what would happen if the earth's
rotation slowed only one mile per hour and the result would be devastating! The
very moon operates as a balance, keeping the earth rotation in a synced
fashion, enabling the weather system to remain constant, within certain
parameters which, if it were not so, one year New York would be New York, and
the next it may be situated near one of the poles.
Great minds, such
as Stephen Hawking say that when things get too complicated the theist will
just fall back on a "god" in a vain effort to avoid the question,
while they, themselves, when their own model fails will suggest a
multiple-universe theory in effect claiming that if the model doesn't work just
apply layer upon layer until it does or any opposition simply gives up in
exasperation.
My concept of God
is that of a great creative force that we, as mortals, will never understand,
we aren't capable. Jesus was strapped with trying to educate simple fishermen,
a tax collector, and a few women as to the way the universe works. Did He try
to explain the time-space continuum to them? Certainly not! At the last supper,
did he try to hold a lecture on molecular reorganization, or the presence of
dark matter, no. He held up a piece of bread and told them, "This is my
body. Whenever you have this ritual you need to remember that!" Jesus was
explaining to them in terms they could get their minds around. They understood
the Passover, and all it meant to them, as Jews, and He was the ultimate
Passover for all people.
We, as
Christians, no, let me rephrase that, as believers, have to accept that there
are some who will never accept our concept, or explanations for the order of
the universe no matter how persuasive our argument. For all their scientific
method they will abandon it, and proceed on the premise that there simply
cannot BE a god and any system that makes that claim is simply rejected outright.
You will never change these people. I didn't change my ideas while watching all
of the documentaries I cited above. They merely reinforced what I already
suspected. And, if you will note, when you forget about all the arguments about
Jesus and Mohammed, the Muslim work was outstanding in its direct analyzation
of the science of mathematics and the correlation to the universe.
As believers, our
explanations look absurd to atheists. Atheists have a hands on, linear
methodology in their universal view, but does that make them evil? Certainly
not! A girl in high school on the East Coast wanted to start a club geared to
atheists like herself so she, and other likeminded kids could gather and
discuss ideas, and feel a oneness. At first the school absolutely forbade it,
but after the ACLU got involved she was allowed to form her group, but was then
bullied into giving it up by the "Christian" community around her.
Tell me how those "Christians" were any different than a radical
Muslim who believes he must destroy all "infidels" to spread his
"faith?" She was accused of being a Satanist. This is so far in left
field if defies explanation but I'll try. A Satanist is a believer. Jesus said,
"Even the demons believe in God, and they tremble." People who subscribe
to this mind set believe there is a god but choose the opposite path. To me
they're like the kid, when we all went to the movies on Saturday, who would
cheer for the guy in the black hat. For whatever psychological reason they have
rejected what is regarded as proper by most other believers for the side that
is completely opposite to that. The atheist simple rejects any spiritual
explanation of the universe, preferring a physical model instead.
As long as you
live you will be formulating your world view. Mine has evolved so much that it
barely resembles what was in my head at sixteen years old. The one constant
remains: There has to be a designer for such a finely turned situation. Can I
explain this to a non-believer? Nope. Can I, myself even ever completely
understand this designer? Absolutely not! Should I judge, or cast stones at
someone who doesn't subscribe to my very own ever changing view? Well, Jesus,
Himself, said, "Judge not lest you be judged." Now, He didn't say
that to be clever. He said that because He knew we could never get our finite
minds around the infinite. I am comfortable with accepting Biblical principles.
The young atheist simply is not.
I am always
amazed at the knee-jerk reaction to any inclusion of Biblical principles in
government. Put a statue of the ten commandments on the courthouse lawn and
certain groups lose their collective minds. The ten commandments are an early
example of codified law given to a bunch of people trying to carve out a
civilized existence out of a horrible situation. I hear all the time about the separation
of church and state, but that's not what the first amendment is all about It
says, "Congress shall make no law respecting the ESTABLISHMENT of religion
..." It forbids Congress from jumping up and making the Baptist Church the
official religion of the United States. It does NOT nullify bringing your
morals, common sense or life experiences to the table when you vote, or make
decisions. How else can you make these decisions? You see, that's what's wrong
with this whole idea that we have to blindly accept that we really have no
opinion or options when it comes to government. When Congress sits in session
can they impose religious guidelines and restrictions on the rest of us?
Constitution says they cannot. Can they let their experience, morality, and
personal beliefs guide how they will vote? You bet they can, and DO! Should
they have anything to do with the little atheist girl wanting to form a club
with her likeminded friends? Well, that's where my Libertarian beliefs kick in.
They have a right to their beliefs, and she has a right to hers!
You will never
convert this little girl. Conversion comes from within. You will never scare a
gay person straight. For whatever psychological reasons that mold our sexuality
it is OUR mold. Our INDIVIDUAL mold. Lead by example. Live your lives by your
principles and if those principles are sound, kind,and not bigoted there are
those who will approve. Cast your bread upon the water, and maybe, just maybe,
you'll get back a sandwich! And that, my friends, is the true God Particle.
No comments:
Post a Comment